Sanjeev K Saxena
Last Activity: 14 Years ago
Thank you so much for making me believe that there is only one approach and explanation to the problem in hand. Please congratulate me for an exactly similar explanation that I had before hand.
There are only two resolutions for p, either it’s PRIME to 3 or NOT. In the first case we can safely take p^2 - 1 as some multiple of 3, say 3 m (m is a positive integer). Now, p^2 - 5 = p^2 - 1 - 3 - 1 = 3 m - 3 - 1 = 3 (m - 1) - 1, and 3 CANNOT divide -1. In the second case, when p is not prime to 3, then p is a multiple of 3, let’s again say p^2 = 3 m so that p^2 - 5 = p^2 - 6 + 1= 3 m - 6 + 1 = 3 (m - 2) + 1, and again, 3 CANNOT divide +1 either.